This will allow to use this representation for Offer and Create activities.
When creating a new MR, the inner Offer's 'object' is a 'Patch' object. When
serving an existing hosted MR, the inner Offer's 'object' is just a URI
pointing to the patch.
If sharer receives Accept on an Offer/Dep where the sharer hosts the child
ticket, it records a RemoteTicketDependency and runs inbox forwarding to ticket
followers. But this relies on a TicketDependencyOffer record already existing.
I'll take care of that in the next patches.
sharerAcceptF and sharerRejectF now use the insertToInbox from
Vervis.Federation.Util instead of their own copies of it, which were identical
anyway. Perhaps gradually all the inbox insertion in all S2S handlers will
switch to using that function.
To be honest, this is a huge patch that changes tons of stuff and probably
should have been broken up into small changes. But I already had the codebase
not building, so... just did all of this at once :P
Basically this patch does the following:
- DB migrations for ticket dependency related tables, e.g. allowing a remote
author and a remote child
- Allowing S2S handlers to provide an async continued processing function,
which is executed and the result then added to the debug page
- Most UI and functionality related to ticket deps is disabled, new
implementation being added gradually via ActivityPub
- Improvements to AP tools, e.g. allow to specify multiple hosts for approved
forwarding when sending out an activity, and allow to specify audience of
software-authored activities using a convenient human-friendly structure
- Implementation of S2S sharerOfferDepF which creates a dependency under a
sharer-hosted ticket/patch and sends back an Accept
- Sharer-patch was already working due to the shared DB tabled
- Repo-patch support added
- Fixed a bug in following project-tickets: It allowed to follow a
sharer-ticket by sending the Follow to the project. Now, the project allows
to follow only the project-tickets, and refuses to handle a sharer-ticket.
Also fixed a bug in which trying to follow a ticket with nonexistent
ltkhid/talkhid would result with 404 as if the actor inbox is nonexistent. Now,
there's a friendly message reported.
The examples in the security vocabulary's spec use "Key" but the JSON-LD
context doesn't define that term. From now on, just in case, recognizing both
"Key" and "CryptographicKey" as indication that the object is a key.
zPlus, thanks for finding this bug!
