hosting/mash-playbook
1
0
Fork 0
Code Pull requests Activity

Upgrade Jitsi (v8960-1 -> v8960-3) and pass jitsi_user_username explicitly

Browse source 
It would work even without explicitly passing `jitsi_user_username` as
auto-detection logic will run. Passing it explicitly spares the Jitsi
role some work.

Related to:

- https://github.com/mother-of-all-self-hosting/ansible-role-jitsi/pull/2
- https://github.com/spantaleev/matrix-docker-ansible-deploy/issues/2974#issuecomment-1784256903
This commit is contained in:
Slavi Pantaleev 2023-10-31 08:34:35 +02:00
parent 1a25ffd9fe
commit 855c986f31
2 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
group_vars/mash_servers
View file

@ -1879,6 +1879,8 @@ jitsi_base_path: "{{ mash_playbook_base_path }}/{{ mash_playbook_service_base_di
jitsi_uid: "{{ mash_playbook_uid }}"
jitsi_gid: "{{ mash_playbook_gid }}"
jitsi_user_username: "{{ matrix_user_username }}"
jitsi_web_container_additional_networks_auto: |
{{
([mash_playbook_reverse_proxyable_services_additional_network] if mash_playbook_reverse_proxyable_services_additional_network else [])

2
requirements.yml
View file

@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
version: v2.7.0-3
name: influxdb
- src: git+https://github.com/mother-of-all-self-hosting/ansible-role-jitsi.git
version: v8960-1
version: v8960-3
name: jitsi
- src: git+https://github.com/mother-of-all-self-hosting/ansible-role-keycloak.git
version: v22.0.5-0