FEDERATION.md: Use participants
for non-actor followers collection
This commit is contained in:
parent
48529627b6
commit
81d41bfb8a
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -565,6 +565,10 @@ Requirements, suggestions and details:
|
||||||
are, and it allows people to opt out of notifications if they previously
|
are, and it allows people to opt out of notifications if they previously
|
||||||
commented on some topic but don't want to be in the discussion anymore. This
|
commented on some topic but don't want to be in the discussion anymore. This
|
||||||
makes it very easy for clients to correctly address comments.
|
makes it very easy for clients to correctly address comments.
|
||||||
|
- The wording in the ActivityPub spec implies that `followers` is a property of
|
||||||
|
actors, and I'm unsure whether it's safe and compatible to use it with
|
||||||
|
non-actors. So until this point is discussed, the temporary proposed name for
|
||||||
|
the followers collection is `participants`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
`GET /luke/outbox/A0O8l`
|
`GET /luke/outbox/A0O8l`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -598,8 +602,6 @@ Requirements, suggestions and details:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
TODO:
|
TODO:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- `followers` is for actors, it seems, by the AP spec? So, what do we call the
|
|
||||||
collection of followers of a ticket?
|
|
||||||
- `replies` and how the C2S object nesting depth proposal
|
- `replies` and how the C2S object nesting depth proposal
|
||||||
- Use `nonActors` in the example?
|
- Use `nonActors` in the example?
|
||||||
- Content format? HTML? Markdown source? Tags? Referenced ticktes?
|
- Content format? HTML? Markdown source? Tags? Referenced ticktes?
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue